Comment on On Hierarchies and Networks | Phil Windley’s Technometria

@windley Your ideas of networks and hierarchies is on the path towards “networks of systems” and “heterarchies of systems”. I saw Geoffrey West at ISSS Sonoma 2006, and his research into allometry is beyond metaphors, and deep into systems science.

A “network of systems” implies that each part (system) is viable on its own.  A hierarchy of parts may be composed of (i) all self-sufficient viable parts (i.e. systems), or (ii) parts that don’t have a function without a whole (e.g. organs in a body).  A “heterarchy of systems” may have parts with multiple functions (or purposes) in multiple wholes.  The ideas are isomorphic across all types of systems (e.g. urban systems, companies, information systems).

You may be interested in Parhankangas, Ing, Hawk et al. (2005) “Negotiated order and network form organizations”.  The systems science community will meet at ISSS San Jose 2012 next July, if you’re in California then.

Comment on On Hierarchies and Networks | Phil Windley’s Technometria.

Like JP and Dion, I think there’s more than a mere metaphor between the city/corporation insights and the ways we build software today. I’d argue that social systems, including cities are models for the techniques and technologies we ought to be using. Networked systems scale better and are more flexible than hierarchical systems. They can absorb complexity better without suffering from the debilitating effects of tight coupling that hierarchical systems create. But I’m ready to go further than I think JP and Dion are.  [….]

In a request-response system the requester is obligated to understand the semantics of the APIs it deals with. In event-driven system, the responsibility for semantics falls on the event processor—the receiver. This is called semantic encapsulation. Turning semantic responsibility around leads to looser coupling.


David Ing blogs at , photoblogs at , and microblogs at . See .

Posted in status

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Beyond this microblog
This content is syndicated to Twitter. For professional perspectives, look to Coevolving Innovations; for a photoblog, look to Reflections, Distractions.
  • 2017/03 Moments March 2017
    Toronto, Ontario; Santa Clara, California; Milpitas, California; San Jose, California; Oakland, California; Hayward, California; Mountain View, California; Palo Alto, California; San Francisco, California; Mountain View, California; Half Moon Bay, California, Pescadero, California; Santa Cruz, California; Tokyo, Japan
  • 2017/02 Moments February 2017
    Toronto, Ontario; Mississauga, Ontario; London, Ontario
  • 2017/01 Moments January 2017
    Toronto, Ontario. (A whole month without leaving town, since Don Mills and Scarborough are Metropolitan Toronto)
  • 2016/12 Moments December 2016
    Helsinki; Finland; London, England; Dublin, Ireland; Toronto, Ontario; Fairfield, Iowa
  • 2016/11 Moments November 2016
    Markham, Ontario; Toronto, Ontario; Scarborough, Ontario; London, Ontario; Montreal, Quebec; Brussels, Belgium; Woluwe Saint Pierre, Belgium; Amersfoort, Netherlands; Hameenlinna, Finland
  • 2016/10 Moments October 2016
    Toronto, Ontario; Richmond Hill, Ontario; Don Mills, Ontario; San Francisco, California; Oakland, California; Berkeley, California; San Jose, California; Mountain View, California; Las Vegas, Nevada; Los Gatos, California
I welcome your e-mail. If you don't have my address, here's a contact page.
%d bloggers like this: