2014/10/16 14:05 Alfred Clatworthy Holmen and Gyuchan Thomas Jun”, How easily understandable complex multi-layered system maps are? — A study on the usability of complex interactive diagrams”, #RSD3

Gyuchan Thomas Jun first day presentation at #RSD3 Relating Systems Thinking and Design 3, in Theories and Methods track, at AHO, Oslo, Norway, moderated by @redesign

This digest was created in real-time during the meeting, based on the speaker’s presentation(s) and comments from the audience. The content should not be viewed as an official transcript of the meeting, but only as an interpretation by a single individual. Lapses, grammatical errors, and typing mistakes may not have been corrected. Questions about content should be directed to the originator. The digest has been made available for purposes of scholarshipby David Ing.

Program is at http://systemic-design.net/rsd3-2014/program/


Thomas is at Loughborough University, presenting on behalf of Alfred who is a student.

Focused on healthcare

have a lot of systems and process maps:  UML, SysML, etc.

Mapping / modelling to identify complexity, aid understanding, improve communication

About 10 years ago, was looking at basic elements

  • Links and nodes
  • Hierarchical links, sequential links, information links
  • Nodes could be people, activity, information
  • Three different links with three different views

Study:  patient discharge processes

  • Did UML diagrams, reviews with healthcare workers
  • Will they accept with the Technology Acceptance Model (Davis, 1989)?

Main finding:  a single diagram cannot effectively capture the full range of perspectives in complex healthcare

e.g. State Transition Diagram for patient status was found helpful

Study 2:  Tried 7 different diagrams (e.g. service blueprint, communications model)

  • Gave them diagrams, asked them which ones they found helpful

Found:

  • Participants familiarity with real pathways (as opposed to those who only came 6 months ago)
  • Psychologist who wasn’t visualize choose one diagram at random
  • Half chose state transition diagrams as best, was in line with the mental model; communication diagram as second, free flow diagrams as third (three people had 20 years experience, the format doesn’t matter).

Study 3:  Safer Medicine Management Pathways

  • Was given three 3-hour workshops, not enough time for systems mapping
  • Expensive to get users
  • Also inconsistent and uneven participation (only have came for all workshops, some only came for last workshop, e.g. social workers were under reorganization)
  • How to prevent complexity in system maps?

OpenIdeo platform

Study 4:  Interactive zoom in/out

Used Prezi

Time was taken until participants felt that they had a good understanding of the map content

Results found weren’t a lot different, just slightly more positive


Sketchnote of presentation by Gyuchan Thomas Jun, drawn by Patricia Kambitsch at https://twitter.com/playthink/status/522865226765463553

Sketchnote of presentation by Gyuchan Thomas Jun, drawn by Patricia Kambitsch

Advertisements

#design, #systems-thinking